Thread:ZeroExalted/@comment-10824773-20131123153309/@comment-10824773-20131123195534

Do you even read what I'm saying?

I started out nicer than I SHOULD have been:

"L115A2 Arctic Wolf; player knocks the sniper with the magazine."

Zombie responds with this:

" The L115A2 Arctic Wolf is a different animation."

My thought process is that "Both guns still have a reload animation in which the player knocks on the gun with some object, whether it's their hand or the magazine. Therefore, the T91 is definitely not the first."

I respond with this, but put a little more force because Zombie is not getting the message.

" The point is, the L115A2 Arctic Wolf animation has the player take the magazine and knock on the sniper. There is no dispute. I don't care if it's a different animation; the knocking happens."

Zombie then goes and decides to escalate to THIS level:

" Do not remove, again."

I'm not taking orders from someone like him; he's an editor like me. I only take direct orders from moderators and admins. By trying to put himself at a position higher than he really is, he's started something he never should have. By now I'm annoyed to the point where I really do want him to understand, so I go and un-do it... again... with a clearer reason, albeit in all-caps:

" WILL YOU NOT GIVE A BETTER REASON? SMH, THE MAGAZINE KNOCKS ON THE SNIPER, YES? THE PLAYER KNOCKS ON THE GUN, YES? YOUR POINT IS INVALID"

Then Zero decides to step in because, indeed, it was getting out of hand and his intervention was necessary.

My methods may not appeal to you, but they work.