Forum:Proposition - Remove the Moderator Status of DynastyW

THIS VOTE RUNS FROM THE 1ST OF MARCH (9:00PM EST), TO THE 8TH OF MARCH (11:59PM EST).

The Issue
Over his two months as a moderator on the CAWiki, DynastyW has shown a very high disrespect for the community, for the rules, and for the wiki. These are all issues which he assured us would not come up, when he asked for a promotion in December. It is for these reasons that I hereby issue this vote to the community as to whether or not Dynasty should keep his position as a moderator. Speaking with Zero, he has stated that he would respect the ruling of this vote whichever way it goes.

The Question
Should the user DynastyW be permitted to keep the position of moderator on the Combat Arms Wiki?

Yes

 * 1) TopsyKretts3 (talk) 01:59, March 2, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

 * The CAWiki has long since had a hard stance on the issues of harassment and profanity. In order to create a respecting, educational, and safe enviorment, the two cannot be allowed to be thrown about. The CAWiki is for spreading information to the players. However, Dynasty has, throughout his time as a moderator on the CAWiki, been reluctant to uphold this rule. This can most be seen in the CAWiki chat where he will allow others, and himself, to spout out profanities, as well as to harass his peers. This moderator's use of profanity and aggressive language also extends to the main site. This he attempts to rationalize by saying that he was drunk at the time.


 * Perhaps he may have been drunk, but that gives him no right to disrespect the community in such a manner. Swearing at and harassing others is no way to treat others, especially when one is supposed to be upholding the rules. However, the pinnacle of disrespect towards the community came when it passed a revised version of the very thing which Dynasty was meant to enforce - the rules. On the 8th of February, 2013, a revised rule set was put up for a vote. It was a vote for it's content, and to make it more accessible. Dynasty saw this vote, commented, yet raised no criticism of it's wording. He neither criticized it in the form of a comment, nor in the form of a vote - he did not vote at all. When the resolution passes and the new rule set was published, Dynasty had a criticism. Not liking the grouping of Harassment/Profanity, dynasty edited the page numerous times in an attempt to re-word it. He did not start a vote, he didn't even ask anyone. Instead he felt that he had the right to overrule a community decided resolution on the rule set simply because he wanted to.


 * When Dynasty asked for his promotion in a forum thread all of these issues were brought up - his arrogance, his participation in harassing and using profanities, his immaturity. He assured us that he had moved past all of it, that it was the old him. He promised us that, upon obtaining this new position, he would act more responsible. Two months into his duties and he's still the same rotten person that he was before. He has not changed, and he never will.


 * TopsyKretts3 (talk) 01:59, March 2, 2013 (UTC)