User blog comment:LunarWing/Wiki's Motive for Editing/@comment-5824819-20140116224356/@comment-10824773-20140117022014

I seem to have worded myself incorrectly here. I'm failing to send the meaning that I wanted to...

I'll sum it up in a paragraph, then... Correctly, this time.

Zero deappointed active mods for reasons I still have yet to know (or is it a N2K basis?). From that point on to these four moderators being appointed, the only actual edits that I frequently saw from those four were from Jen, who added .gifs and pictures to articles and created a few pages. However, none of the wordings, grammar mistakes and other inconsistencies were fixed by her on some of the pages, and this is considered extremely unacceptable to me. I may be assuming that the performance of users from the deappoint wave to the promotions is the judge for who is moderator or who isn't, but it's what I've seen, and frankly this is cause for some serious analyzation for the wiki to me. Why is it that Jen and the rest start making a bunch of actual text editing AFTER they are appointed? Why couldn't they do it beforehand?

This is the dilemma I am faced with.

And no, I am not trying to get myself to be moderator. I know I have an over 9000% better chance of using OPK undetected in a game than get mod status.