Thread:ComradeJ/@comment-4620155-20130430203621/@comment-3255675-20130501082602

Do you re-read what you write? Did you read what I wrote? I said "I did not say that I was patient directly." Just because an adverb is describing a verb, it doesn't mean that it correlates with that person. Someone could be impatient after waiting patiently.

As you say in most of your arguments: you cannot assume that I would do so. I didn't trust you. You could be abusing your moderator power again.

You seem to enjoy going round and round in circles. I've told you earlier the reason for blocking you for 2 hours is that your edits need to be regulated and that no moderator/admin was on the wiki at the time to do so. When I got on the wiki, you had already started editing half an hour ago. I checked the news feed and saw well over 15 articles already poorly edited. I wouldn't be on the wiki for another 2 hours - think how much damage you could've done by then. Blocking me 2 hours doesn't mean that it will regulate my edits. I could be editing maliciously again after my ban. There is no excuse for blocking me that long. You might think they are 'poorly edited," but other people and myself might think they're good.

- think how much damage you could've done by then. I would not do that much damage if I'm only messing up 1-2 categories.

If you're replying to a thread that informs you that you are wrong, you do not continue making those wrong things before you reply. You reply first. I cannot reply because SOMEONE blocked me. I didn't have any sufficient time. Hmm... I wonder who could that be.

Once again, practise what you preach. You have a habit of ignoring my replies and making arguments that my replies have answered. I'm also still waiting on your response on me stating, on Thread:78913, that your use of TopsyKretts3's situation is invalid. I've already stated that I am not apologizing to you. That's the difference between my situation and his situation.