Thread:ZeroExalted/@comment-3255675-20140511212504/@comment-1242640-20140512024230

Interesting, considering the fact you've asked me to promote BlueChoco and Kate to staff positions, on the basis that "you liked them" in private messaging. Shall I provide the screenshots on the proposition page so that the others can verify?

Secondly, you don't seem to realize how easily we're allowing you to do this. The situation stands:

You asked to be an administrator temporarily (citing "urgent business," and repeatedly harassing me on the site by telling me to join Chat several times), without Community approval. After your rightful duration was up, you decided that you liked having power for a bit, and now wanted to keep it - despite a lack of pressing reasons to appoint a new administrator.

So you start a proposition (also "illegal," as we've decided as a Community in the past - with you there - that there is no reason to start propositions without rightful basis), on the assumption that if you had enough supporters, you would immediately be brought to an authoritative position; disregarding the fact that at least two other staff members did not voice their opinion.

All your wrongdoings aside, we went by the verdict of the proposition - and I appointed Topsy as well, to balance you out with an opposite. There, you forget your place once again - not only does your proposition clearly ask, "Should ComradeJ be promoted to Site Administrator," instead of being a formal application, you also assumed that if the referendum went through, you would be the only one appointed.

Not only did appointing Topsy affect you in any way, you also took offense immediately - unbecoming of a person who wants a position of authority. Your proposition did not mention him, and assuming it even carries any weight, it does not affect any decision to appoint him.

And from there since, you've been harassing other users - including me and Topsy - by starting a flame war over reasons that are both unjustified and unnoteworthy, and glancing neutral parties like Mud with your side comments.

The entire name of this thread, "Malicious collaboration," speaks volumes.