User blog comment:H1!/Ragers: A problem/@comment-1906486-20110630220314

I'm all for supporting people not getting kicked, but if people try abusing that to keep hackers in, it would be the downfall of the system. People can already vote, but it's only if the E-Mod did a good job or not. It shouldn't count non-voters as yes, but as a neutral vote. So it would impact the E-Mod's rep more, as to avoid spam kicking people.

Reason I don't vote usually is, if the E-Mod is abusive I don't vote till the end. So it gives me a longer time, to actually be able to get kills/captures/etc. Due to I know usually I'll be kicked, for no reason other than they're envious. Or they want to team stack, which is also mean I find. Should be that if one side, is being kicked too much, the E-Mod loses kicking rights of that team.

Such as: E-Mod is on Alpha and Bravo starts doing well. So they start kicking people. After x people (varies, depending on time and room size), they get locked out of kicking the Bravo team. It'll allow hackers in no doubt, and possibly be a mass rampage. Just it would also in effect, show that their abuse isn't tolerated. I'd hate to be in an 8v8 room, and then 5 of the 8 get kicked. A 3v8 match isn't fair period, especially when mods do the rigging.