Thread:ComradeJ/@comment-5096351-20130530235022/@comment-4620155-20130531084417

ComradeJ wrote: What I meant by badly written is he doesn't fix his grammar and spelling. In my view, I always strive to have the wiki in a good language.

There is no way that I am harassing him. Saying "you don't want to embarrass yourself" is not really harassment.

It is harassment. Logs interpreted it as harassment, up to the point where he told me.

I already knew that Logs will post those screenshots about me, which is why I purposely did it because I also caught you talking behind my back too. I knew you were purposely swaying votes by requesting Logs to private message you, so don't act like you didn't know. That is a downright lie. The screenshot is evidence itself. And as for swaying votes; yes, I may want to sway votes in my favour - that is the nature of ALL candidates of a debate. Each side wants to emerge victorious. But swaying votes in the manner of psychologically tricking others consistently by giving reasons that have absolutely nothing to do with the debate is absolutely revolting. You should know better.

EpaX, why can't you just admit your mistakes, live up with it, and apologize to me? Honestly, if you had done that, I'm sure things would settle easier.

Yes, I realised recently that I made some mistakes due to misunderstandings; and for that I am sorry. But I am not to blame for the entire incident. You blundered too, but your pride caught your tongue. You refuse to apologise on your part. That is the kind of person you are.

Remember, the proposition is not aiming at me, but it's aiming at you.

Yes, the proposition is aimed at me. This discussion is about inauthentic votes that you have induced, and whether or not they should be removed.