Thread:EpaX/@comment-71.198.203.130-20130430215018/@comment-71.198.203.130-20130501090733

For the point of this argument, it does not. Word choice is universal. You need to pick your words carefully. You will fail your English class if you do not know this already. Words can be the same and different. Gather or loot? Nosy or curious? Poke or stab? Ignore or defiant or resistive'?

You don't seem to understand how logic works. There wouldn't be any NEED to block them because there wouldn't be any spam editing in the first place. But they are continuously editing, just very slow. Judging by your behavior, you ban them too and accuse them of "continuously spamming." Even like I said, you have no right to ban them for spamming.

When I said you're ignorant, I was talking about BEFORE the block. Right now, I'm talking about AFTER. Be logical. How was I ignorant when I was editing articles. I said nothing. After the block, the only thing I've been editing is your ignorant illogical arguments. You still have have negated them yet, thus, proving you still guilty as charged.