Thread:ComradeJ/@comment-2052424-20140511135527/@comment-5850386-20140511214542

First of all, Ark labled the late votes "opinions", not Topsy or Zero. Also, the date the proposition ended was pretty clearly stated and they had plenty of time to act. Its their fault that they didnt vote on time.

Second, its not a cardinal sin that people on the wiki talk outside of the wiki. As we dont know what they were talking about, they really cant be portrayed as "collaborating" agaisnt you. They could have simply been talking about the Ukranian Crisis or w/e, but we dont know. The accusation that they colluded is purely conjecture

Likewise, the accusation that Zero maliciously ignored the vote is conjecture

How many of the users who did not have 50 or more edits are actually active? Some people just made an account and never came back, skewing your data. The wiki community does not include dead or inactive accounts. If someone died or left the country, do we still count them in the census? No. Do we let everyone vote for the presidential elections? No. If theyre not qualified to vote, why should they? These inactive people arent even part of the wiki community, so why do they get to decide what happens? If "all editors are equal", why not just open voting for anons as well?