Thread:ZeroExalted/@comment-3255675-20140511212504/@comment-3255675-20140512022524

ZeroExalted wrote: In any case, I actually did forget about the deadline - so I apologize for that. You shouldn't forget the deadline when you visit the proposition page already. An issue that is very important shouldn't be forgotten. Now you know why we need another administrator to monitor the wiki. ZeroExalted wrote: However, as a staff member himself, Topsy did the right thing by closing the proposition when he realized it was past the date. I could've closed it myself if I wanted to. A staff member is not really an official in announcing important issues. A higher authority fits the picture better. ZeroExalted wrote: It also seemed fairly prudent to do to ask the other staff members for their opinions, since the two I mentioned had previously commented without ever actually voting. It's obvious that they both don't want to vote, because they're on neutral sides. If you sit down and critically think about it, then you shouldn't have to ask them. ZeroExalted wrote: Furthermore, although I said I liked the temp idea, that didn't influence my decision. I know something else influenced your decision. I'll let you decide what it is on your own since you're the one who knows it. ZeroExalted wrote: As far as I'm concerned, you're both bonafide admins - though if you are unable to act in your position without personal bias towards Topsy, that may present a problem. Someone like a bureaucrat yourself shouldn't favor someone more than others. That's pure bias there too. Out everyone else on the wiki, you made TopsyKretts3 an administrator. Why didn't you pick someone else? Heck, make BlueChoco an administrator. I understand that TopsyKretts3 may not like me because of his personal reasons. I am not bias towards anyone on the wiki. The only a reason why I do not like someone in particular is because of their actions, not discrimination. Actions speak louder than words. ZeroExalted wrote: And as to why Topsy is allowed to be an auxiliary admin, please read the overview of this page - which you should be familiar with, as you are now a respected part of it. You recently changed the rules yourself, and no one else agreed to it. All Editors Are Equal is an article written by someone else other than yourself. No one has ever touched or changed it (you better not ever change it yourself without community approval), and the only change I see is your edit on the administration page without community approval.