Forum:Proposition - Updated Weapon Template

THIS VOTE RUNS FROM THE 30TH OF AUGUST 2014 (4:00 PM PST), TO THE 20TH OF MAY (11:59 PM PST).

Introduction
This is what everyone has been waiting for! The new updated template!

I've modified the existing item template in my sandbox for a few hours, making sure that it's glitch-free (although it may still have errors).

I've made this proposition so we all can find a solution and decide what's best for the wiki. Voice your opinion here!

Backstory
The recent Combat Arms Reboot patch has revamped and renovated the whole shop, making most of our information not matching to what it is displayed in the game. Therefore, we need to make significant changes to the wiki as a whole.

What should we do now?
We need to decide what we should keep, add, and remove to help our readers find what they are looking for.

Let's vote!
There are sections below in which you may vote and voice your opinions. You can just vote yes using or no using. A reason is not required, as this proposition can be a quick vote. You do not have to vote in every section if you do not wish to vote.

Old Weapon Statistics
The Combat Arms Wiki is a database for Combat Arms. It is a place where users can find information to everything about Combat Arms. If users wanted to look for old weapon statistics, should we keep them on the wiki and archive it or remove it altogether? Use to keep the old statistics,  to remove them completely.

Support

 * 1) We need to keep the statistics in case if anyone ever needs a reference. Also, the statistics in the game files may not match the ones displayed in the shop. ComradeJ,  the Queen of Explosives. (talk) 23:00, August 30, 2014 (UTC)

Weight vs. Portability
The Combat Arms Reboot has changed "portability" and renamed it "weight." However, some people will disagree with one another about the definition of the words. Therefore, a word may be preferred over the other. Should we use "weight" or use "portability?" Use to change to "weight,"  to keep it at "portability."

Support

 * 1) I think we should match the game's description to avoid confusion. Although there is a slight difference between the definition of portability and weight, I really don't mind about which word is being used. I just don't want to confuse our readers. ComradeJ,  the Queen of Explosives. (talk) 23:00, August 30, 2014 (UTC)

'''Ammo vs. Max Ammo and Remaining Ammo"
The Combat Arms Reboot has also changed the way we see number of ammunition a weapon has. Instead of having the regular number of ammunition over the regular of ammunition in reserve (e.g. 30/90, 50/50, 100/100, 1/2), Nexon has made 2 separate sections for ammunition: max ammo and remaining ammo. Should we change ammo to two separate sections, "Max ammo and Remaining ammo," or keep "ammo" as is? Use to change ammo to "Max ammo and Remaining ammo,"  to keep it at ammo.

Oppose

 * 1) I think that we should keep it at ammo because max ammo and remaining ammo is a bit confusing. ComradeJ,  the Queen of Explosives. (talk) 23:00, August 30, 2014 (UTC)

Comments/Other Suggestions
Maybe we can change the wording of max ammo and remaining ammo to have the definition fit better? ComradeJ, the Queen of Explosives. (talk) 23:00, August 30, 2014 (UTC)

Kill Feed Icon
This is new feature that I have implemented in the item template. It features a kill feed icon, which is what you see in the game when a player kills another player with the weapon they used. It is really helpful for our readers to see how a weapon looks like in the kill feed. However, some people may not like it for other particular reasons. Should we implement the kill feed icon in the item template? Use for yes,  for no.

Support

 * 1) ComradeJ,  the Queen of Explosives. (talk) 23:00, August 30, 2014 (UTC)

Questions, comments, and concerns about anything else
If you guys noticed the M134 Minigun in the shop, it does not display rate of fire and accuracy. Should we combine the old and the new statistics together? ComradeJ, the Queen of Explosives. (talk) 23:00, August 30, 2014 (UTC)