Thread:TopsyKretts3/@comment-5093628-20130722045405/@comment-2052424-20130722051003

Why am I against Comrade replacing sufficient GIFs with ones of equal quality? Because there is no point behind it other than Comrade wanting her name on it. My GIFs follow the wiki's standards, and are of good quality.

The reason I left the message about Comrade not being mature enough to handle the situation was because of the wording of her proposition. Did you read the proposition? Even just the title of it is something you'd expect from a six year old who threw a tantrum because they didn't get the last bar of candy. Here, let me link you to it.

Forum:Proposition - Remove TopsyKretts3's Bad M16A4 Firebug Animations

Overwriting a bad edit is perfectly okay, but overwriting an edit which is not bad, with an edit that is of equal quality servers no purpose other than Comrade wanting to have her name on the page that she otherwise would have missed due to not being fast enough. It's being escalated because of the principal at stake: that the winner wins. I finished my GIFs first, and they were good. Comrade wanted her GIFs up and had told the person who lent her the gun that they would be, so she tried to replace acceptable GIFs.

You say that there are plenty more GIFs to be added - tell that to Comrade. She's the one who started this whole mess because she wasn't willing to let one GIF, which she was beaten to, go.