User blog:Liveandie/On Reflection

Did Nexon make the best decision? In my honest opinion, no. They didn't. I am writing this blog post based entirely on the Toy gun Incident. Let's get some facts straight.

1. I am suspended because of this incident. First time ever of course.

2. I received 2 million gp in profit.

3. Honestly if Nexon doesn't take away any of my items this affects me about 10 %. I bought 180 day duration gp gear in anticipation for a possible suspension and was proved right. All it does is bring my gear down by some weeks (woohoo)

4. I have over 300,000 gp in alternate accounts. First off

I personally felt that what I did was NOT user abuse what so ever. Why? "USER ABUSE IS ANY FORM OF GAME EXPLOITATION OR HARASSMENT THAT DIMINISHES THE COMBAT ARMS EXPERIENCE FOR ANY COMBAT ARMS PLAYER. GAME EXPLOITATION INCLUDES THE USE OF BOTTING OR HACKING PROGRAMS, TAKING ADVANTAGE OF GLITCHES WITHIN THE GAME, AND ANY OTHER ACTION THAT CREATES AN UNFAIR ADVANTAGE. "

First off I have to go on my usual anti nexon rant and laugh... "Unfair advantage" Tell that to those who have orthus and max's (I'm talking about those who will still have it in 2 weeks)  compared to pure gp users... Anyway.'s

I can agree to a certain degree (That rhyme). I pretty much broke those terms. I can argue around it but let's say I don't. This article isn't really trying to defend my and many other users actions but rather to argue what Nexon should have done or could have done.

So really this is a forum open question: What should Nexon have done differently (Or could have )

I'll post my own opinions a bit later (due to tiredness)

