Thread:ComradeJ/@comment-4620155-20130430203621/@comment-3255675-20130501053300

MVP EdwardJ, EpaX said "your arguments are obsolete," which is the reason that I assume he is trying to end the debate and says he wins. I find that very rude.

Translation: He is trying to say, "nope, your argument is invalid, I win, kthxbai."

For your information, I don't think you have read the full thread plus the one here. But I will explain it here again.

Once I hit the submit button for all of the articles, I clicked Wiki Activity. I see EpaX reverting my previous edits. It took me 5 minutes to figure out why he was reverting my edits. Then I scrolled up and see a notification. Afterwards, I was carefully reading his message which took me 1-2 minutes. As soon as I finished reading, I typed my reply. It took me 3 replies to find out that I couldn't reply to his thread. I scrolled up again and found out that he gave me a "blocked" badge next to my name.

Like I said earlier, look at the other thread, not just this one. I did not use an anonymous IP by the way. I was borrowing my brother's computer. I already apologized for dodging ban as per that thread. But it was for a good reason. Once you get banned, you cannot do anything on your account anymore. You can't even go on chat and explain yourself. Unlike getting banned on Combat Arms, you can explain yourself via the customer service ticketing system. I actually can't talk to the adminstrator here when I got banned, even though Wikia say I can do that. And to add further, it was not an essay.

It was not just 2 hours ban. I initially accepted the 1 hour ban. I patiently waited for an hour until EpaX decided to extend my ban. How would you like it if you were in jail for a week and the police suddenly decided to keep you in for an additional month because they want to?

EpaX did not gave me a warning. Instead, he gave me a warning after banning me.

And like I said earlier, I apologized for dodging ban, which was wrong, but it had to be done. Who knows if EpaX decided to extend my ban again? I started dodging ban after he extended by ban. But I am not apologizing to him because it was his fault for not waiting patiently. He only gave me less than 10 minutes to react before banning me. The least he could have done is waited 30 minutes or so to receive a response. I took a screenshot and I still have proof that he banned me in less than 10 minutes and did not give me a warning.

As for [[User:EpaX|EpaX], you should open your mind a bit wider. You think to intellectually about the reason why one might do that. In case you can't figure it out, I'll just simply tell you.

Opening multiple tabs is great for comparing edits, which is why I do it a lot. If I edit an article one at a time and later look at another article, I might find a mistake I didn't fix from the article I just published. I will have to go back and fix it again, which is unnecessary.

You do not need to insult my way of editting, a moderator should respect every users' editting style, whether if it's good or your so called "absurd" editing.