Thread:ZeroExalted/@comment-2052424-20120316204659

Seeing as I put a ban on a fellow Moderator it seemed necessary to share the evidence with you.

As I was strolling through the block logs looking for someone who had appealed their ban I found some of Mclinsky's previous ban comments to be somewhat out of line. The ones I am referring to are, "19:18, 30 January 2012 Mclinsky (wall | contribs | block) changed block settings for 58.165.27.32 (wall) with an expiry time of 999 Years (anonymous users only, account creation disabled) ‎ (8: Harassment/Profanity: Negabandit may have been a little harsh. I suppose that you may want to come back after you cool off a little bit, so I altered the suspension time. Come back in another 999 years fuckface.) (unblock | change block)"

As well as this lesser comment, "23:41, 30 January 2012 Mlinsky (wall | contris | block) blocked Quarantine-Ninja (wall | contribs) with an expiry time of 1000 Years (account creation disabled) ‎ (12: Use of multiple Wikia Accounts: Maybe perma-ban was a little harsh, but i am getting a little tired of your shit. Come back in a thousand years.) (unblock | change block)"

Could you please instruct all other officials with the ability to ban that the comment/reason box on ban forms is not a place for harassment, but rather a place to clarify the reason for a ban. 