Thread:ComradeJ/@comment-2052424-20140128130535/@comment-3255675-20140128185106

Soulblydd wrote: A wouldn't have suited the guidelines?

I never knew that template exists. Thank you for showing me it. TopsyKretts3 wrote:

The wouldn't have put Comrade's name on the file, which, judging by her posts, is what she really values. Really? Are you serious? Why would I care if the file has my name on it? Are you kidding me?

I don't value if the file has my name or not; what I value most if the quality of the information and images we are providing our users. I try to the the best of my ability to improve the wiki. If you assume that I love to have my name on files, then you're the one that's being malicious and detrimental.

On a side note, if I really do value having my name on files, then do you think I would've replaced all images by now?

TopsyKretts3 wrote:

The original image will stay. Nope.

As a matter of fact, the original image is actually the one I uploaded because I extracted it directly from the website.

On the other hand, we're going to delete both images because, under your definition of "malicious and detrimental," it causes harm to the wiki. Your edit counts and my edit counts are already counted for the reason of reverting each other's file edits.

And judging by the way you "never like to be wrong," you should cut behavior out before you will cause more damage to the wiki. Please do what is best for wiki that will benefit everyone in future, not what you think is right. I strictly follow by the philosophy that this wiki is run by the community; not mines, not yours, not anyone's.