Thread:ComradeJ/@comment-4620155-20130430203621/@comment-3255675-20130501080645

Do you re-read what you write? No, did you read what I write? I said "I did not say that I was patient directly." Just because someone uses an adverb to describe another verb it doesn't mean that they themselves directly correlate to their behavior. Someone can become impatient after waiting patiently too long.

As you say in most of your arguments: you cannot assume that I would do so. I did not trust you. I cannot tell your behavior judging from you extending my ban duration. Your actions speak louder than your words.

You seem to enjoy going round and round in circles. I've told you earlier the reason for blocking you for 2 hours is that your edits need to be regulated and that no moderator/admin was on the wiki at the time to do so. When I got on the wiki, you had already started editing half an hour ago. I checked the news feed and saw well over 15 articles already poorly edited. I wouldn't be on the wiki for another 2 hours. Your argument is invalid. How is blocking me for 2 hours will regulate my edits. You might never know, I could be editing more bad may not disagree with, and claim that to be a "bad edit". 2 hours is not necessary. And like I said earlier, there could be an administrator or a moderator that is hiding behind the shadows. They may not be doing anything since they agree with my edits. And over 15 articles is not your so called "poorly edited" articles. Those edited articles are a misunderstanding of the category meaning.

- think how much damage you could've done by then. It's not a lot of damage if I mess up only 1-2 categories.

If you're replying to a thread that informs you that you are wrong, you do not continue making those wrong things before you reply. You reply first. I tried replying, but SOMEONE denied me that privilege, thank you very much.

Once again, practise what you preach. You have a habit of ignoring my replies and making arguments that my replies have answered. I'm also still waiting on your response on me stating, on Thread:78913, that your use of TopsyKretts3's situation is invalid. I already responded to that. I already stated that I am not apologizing to you. Please read carefully.