User blog comment:BlueChoco/Nexon's Fatal Mistake?/@comment-169.233.25.41-20110804085002/@comment-1906486-20110804162516

I must applaud you for actually writing all that, and I actually do stop and take time to read blogs/comments like this. In your defense for Hauser I'm in no way bashing him, and personally I have him + Baron as perm. Heavy and Commando vests are really restrictive, and don't allow for a better bit of control of weaponry as a result. How can a lightweight like Raven carry a minigun, and still run around with it while we're just a tank if we use an MG?

Also yes the entire spec price drop is abysmal, you basically hand people a candy. Then they go ask for more, you shove a giant mountain of candy towards them. I know very poor analogy but still, lowering prices + low ranks = more per match and it's hard to see a normal player model. Sure I drop the entire reward of meds/flame/minigun/etc, for having the extra mobility and more weaponry. Does that mean I deserve to die at their hands, because Nexon is forcing them down our throats? Heck a merc would be more useful to me, as it's limiting your vest to make you think carefully on gear. Problem is the price is WAY TOO HIGH!

Really I might be running on a dated machine, and I might be getting an average of 20-30fps in a full room. Does that mean though, I need to spend a few hundred to a thousand, so I can play CA again? I know what you mean how stressful it is though, how badly managed the resource usage is. Then they come back and slap us in the face, and tell us they're actually sad we blame them for the lag. Heck I used to run integrated graphics at first, when I joined up in CA. I could handle all 20 rounds of Cabin Fever, then when the UI changed it got harder. Then more intensive changes to the UI came, and it got worse to the point I couldn't play it.

Recently I added a video card to play, as my fps normally on a full room peaked around 15-20fps. It's no huge upgrade but better than shared memory video, and on top of that I added 2GB of RAM. Using a 64bit OS to use the memory to it's maximum, on top of using a 1GB GeForce 210 card. I might be a bit behind in hardware, but still I can run UT3 on pretty high graphic detail in a 32 player match. Minimal lag!

Tell me Nexon though why are you specs rated so low, but yet your game demands more? You clearly raised your spec requirements, but in secret you'd rather keep it not changed to grab more players to gain money from. It's clear they don't care though, or would even consider actually straightening out their sloppy coding.

'Combat Arms' Minimum Specs: *P3 1Ghz *256MB RAM *Win2K *GeForce2 MX *2GB Space

Recommended Specs: *P4 2.4Ghz *512MB RAM *WinXP *GeForce FX 5600 *2GB Space

'Unreal Tournament 3' Minimum Specs: *2Ghz (single-core) *512MB RAM *Nvidia 6200+ *DirectX9 *8GB Space

Recommended Specs: *2.4Ghz (dual-core) *1GB RAM *Nvidia 7800GTX+ *DirectX9c *8GB Space